Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of 9

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep the article. --Canderson7 02:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] House of 9

Was listed for speedy deletion but is not a speedy candidate. It's a movie with Dennis Hopper, its IMDb entry is at http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0395585/. Maybe someone can make a real encyclopedia article or stub out of this. No vote from me. Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 12:24, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

• Comment - Copied and pasted - Googling the first paragraph (between speech marks" produces a lot of hits. See eg. [1]. TheMadBaron 13:55, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep I removed the apparently copied text, and a left micro-stub, which I think has good potential for improvement, especially given this is a recent film with a major star. --rob 14:04, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Abstain - I removed the copyvio, and my changes were replaced with a plot section that is a complete copyvio. So, I'll leave this for others. --rob 14:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• I'm sure that was just an accident - the user edited in the same minute you did, reverting your edit.... and I reverted it right back. Your opinion should still count.... but personally, I'm inclined towards delete. TheMadBaron 19:31, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per rob's original vote; I agree with his reasoning that this stub has potential. --DavidConrad 21:02, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I'm very sorry about my flip-flopping here. I shouldn't let a revert effect my voting. I'm back on keep, on the same grounds, that a recent movie, by a big star, will garner improvement, regardless of whether it's me, or somebody else who does it. Also, the Dennis Hopper article has so many film credits, there's really no space to describe his role in each one there, so a separate article for each full-length movie he's done seems jusstified to me. --rob 22:50, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I am sure there will be someone who will want to expand this. Alf ^melmac 07:34, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.