Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horsley Hills

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 19:19, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Horsley Hills

Terribly formatted article, doesn't seem to have much capacity for expansion, doesn't seem notable enough. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 16:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - Many articles are fixable with a little elbow grease. Endomion 17:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - The standard of notability applied to geographic locations would either require the deletion of thousands of equally, or less, notable locations, or keeping this one. I vote for an inclusive policy for such, it may take a while to find somebody with the local knowledge to expand the article. In the meantime, I will clean up the article if it is kept by vote. SailorfromNH 17:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - take another look at the article please. Endomion 17:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Is there a way to nominate an article as "crappy" without having to go through AfD? It seems that half of my AfD nominations end up being wrong after someone fixes up the article. Anyway, nomination withdrawn. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 18:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Wikipedia:Cleanup Uncle G 19:16, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Nice job on the article rewrite, now a Strong Keep SailorfromNH 21:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, real place, and thanks for the cleanup. Kappa 05:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.