The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was The result of this debate was Speedy delete as vandalism.May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:00, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
The title suggests that it actually has the potential to be quite a decent article. But not the way it is at the moment. XYaAsehShalomX 17:32, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.