Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical musicology

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 00:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Historical musicology

This article has nothing to do with the academic discipline of historical musicology

• Delete - as stated, this information does not relate to historical musicology. Suggest that the text is added to the entries for Techno music and Rave party (note: some of the information is already included in the Techno music article). CLW 08:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - this article has now been re-written from scratch and the information is now both relevant and useful CLW 09:29, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Jahsonic 11:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. The current article is irrelevant. However, there is scope for an article on this topic as it seems to be a valid academic discipline. Capitalistroadster 00:56, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I have rewritten the article to refer to the discipline of historical musicology. Capitalistroadster 05:20, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Although my knowledge of musicology is limited, this looks like a good article. In fact, this article should not have been vfd'd, but just "emptied". I even removed the link to the subject from the music page. My apologies and thank you Capitalistroadster. --Jahsonic 07:03, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. *drew 00:38, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.