Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Unity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, article is kept. - Liberatore(T) 15:23, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hindu Unity

nn website, possible CSD, but I'm not sure Tango 18:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, it has an Alexa ranking of 839,348 and there are 71 links to it on the web --Deville (Talk) 20:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Deville. In any case, am always doubtful of new pages that have three lines of information but never forget to put in the founder's name. Hornplease 08:50, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Deville. Stifle (talk) 21:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete agree with Hornplease. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the alexa rating is a bit unhelpful because it isn't a pop-culture organization and it is Indian-based. I'm not joking, I stumbled across this site in 2002 and spent a long time reading it.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Deville. utcursch | talk 03:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I've also read this website a year back or so. I think this is an organization that deserves some sort of mention. Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - agree with noble eagle --Dangerous-Boy 03:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Alexa rank in particular. Regardless of content or locality, 839,348 is just too low. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per Blnguyen and Nobleeagle. Google hits aren't always a good indication because the internet tends to be Eurocentric. Gizza^{Chat ©} 10:23, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.