Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hibiki Tokai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Doc ^ask? 11:06, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hibiki Tokai

Is this an article? _→AzaToth 16:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

• Looks like animecruft, but given precedent, I'd say Speedy merge with Vandread. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 18:53, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional keep if someone cleans it up and makes it proper summary -> main article. Kotepho 02:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or merge. It appears to be a copyvio but all the sites matching it on Google are WP mirrors. Doesn't seem very notable. Stifle (talk) 23:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect. I love merging but I hate merge votes on AfD, because people just say to merge and then leave the issue alone. The truth is, there's nothing in the content of this article that needs merging into Vandread, which has good information on this character. Mangojuice 11:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional keep as per above. Monni 15:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect. The article has enough info on this character. Kevin 04:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic fancruft (preferably) or redirect. MCB 05:44, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge. Definitely needs a bit of wikifying. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:55, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as above. --Tango 15:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. OSU80 03:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.