Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harpies in market-driven culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harpies in market-driven culture

Article was created by a user who was clearing out a trivia section from Harpy and didn't write the material. He has no attachment to the article and considers it "drivel" as he indicated upon discussing the prod which was removed by a different user. As I stated in the prod, article appears to be an indiscriminate collection of information, and a synthesis of data that results in original Research.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom AdamBiswanger1 04:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep The title could be changed to Harpies in Popular culture instead of the above title. Maybe merge it into the Harpy article itself--Ageo020 04:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

That's where the material originally resided. It was removed from there as inappropriate by the article creator (see Wikipedia:Trivia#Recommendations for handling Trivia and Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles--Fuhghettaboutit 04:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete since the title is WP:OR and there's not much evidence the article is anything else. Just zis Guy you know? 10:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above, it's WP:OR Lurker 14:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Listcruft. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate source of information. BigE1977 16:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• rofl... what a name. I thought for a minute it would be an article about those harridans who line-drive you out of the way at linen sales. Um, Delete ... sheesh. KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and expand Harpy entry The article is pointless and should be deleted. For the record - take note of the awful writing style. However I think there is some use in expanding on the use of Harpies in modern culture in the main entry, as long as its not just another list.Adam Slack 23:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.