Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo vs Unreal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:20, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Halo vs Unreal

POV, original research, idiosyncratic non-topic Savant1984 04:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like fancruft. Durova 04:58, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This would be useless comparisoncruft (we don't need articles comparing every FPS ever) even if it wasn't bordering on gibberish. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 05:01, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Incoherent, POV... nothing salvagable. --W.marsh 05:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Game review, original research. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:43, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete OR, POV and (worst of all) gamecruft. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 15:25, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; POV original research should always be discouraged, and we are not a site for game reviews. --Idont Havaname 15:39, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. What's next? Differences Between Pokémon and Digimon? —Cryptic (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, I know of at least once (and possibly twice) that comparisons along those lines have been deleted on AFD. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 01:54, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, media reviews not encyclopedic. Gazpacho 03:40, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Game review. *drew 03:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.