Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Waller
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete as {{nn-bio}} Stifle 22:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hal Waller
As per db-bio speedy deletion, just to make the deletion definate since the tag isn't surviving a minute on the page. If this doesn't get deleted, i'm uploading biographies of all my past school teachers. └VodkaJazz/talk┐ 13:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not Delete, obviously fulfills all of the proposed WP:PROFTEST. Sandstein 14:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Very notable teacher. He is notrelated to Fat Rik? Bu if he was, I could be tempted to change my vote. Badgerpatrol 14:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not Delete nn-bio~, Charting the Autobiographies of Mark Twain seems to be a thesis project and a very reputible sourceon Twain.[1] with 16 Google hits Gu 17:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not Delete {{db-bio}} Gwernol 17:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not delete - very notable. --Edwy 18:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not Delete I'm sure he is a wonderful teacher, and an inspiration to his students, and high school teacher would needs something exceptional to be considered notable. Hal Waller fits this criteria. Fan1967 20:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not Delete not speedy delete because there are some assertions of notability there. And there is much in the article that establishes notability. Capitalistroadster 21:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:12, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not Speedy Delete High school teachers are almost never notable. However, Mr. Waller is an exeception. He should definitely have his own page. JeffBurdges 14:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.