Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. - Bobet 16:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Guler

Appears to be complete bollocks. Only Google hit returned for "Guler Kingdom" is this article. Delete as nominator. Hynca-Hooley 00:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Hoax. No Guru 00:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as very bizarre complete bollocks. Almost reads like something out of some SF alternate history universe. Mythical country with impossible history. Slightly different version of it appears here [[1]] attributed to a Stanford professor who doesn't seem to actually exist. Fan1967 00:29, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination Jedi6 00:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable possible hoax. Capitalistroadster 00:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:V and WP:BALLS. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Pavel Vozenilek 01:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Hoax. Ziggurat 02:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a hoax. —Eternal Equinox | talk 03:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Original research, {{hoax}}.  (aeropagitica)  06:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as hoax and nonsense. --Terence Ong 10:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. Adbarnhart 19:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per Nom. --Krashlandon (e) 21:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Hoax. Eivind 05:52, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 10:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: The Urbandictionary link Fan1967 found makes this a copyvio. User:Zoe|^(talk) 19:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment Not sure about that, as a good deal of Urbandictionary seems to have been copied from WP Fan1967 21:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete hoax. -- Alpha269 17:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.