Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group-Office

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix 15:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Group-Office

Tagged {notabaility} by Perfecto somke weeks ago, issue not addressed. No evidence of significance. Just zis Guy you know? 22:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as not notable. Bobby1011 23:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Monkeyman^(talk) 23:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stifle 09:35, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is somewhat specialized software & there are over 1000 forum members & over 1000 downloads. This is especially significant because it is a collaborative webapp (I think 5 users per webapp deployment would be somewhat conservative). I therefore think it meets the proposed WP:SOFTWARE.--Karnesky 01:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I created the page originally. It was my first Wikipedia page ever, so my apologies if it is not correctly created or tagged. I believe this page should be kept. Though not a huge project, it should be documented. SourceForge.net shows that the Group Office project is getting a decent number of downloads per day, and a good big of fly by traffic to their project page. Cadethacker 21:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.