Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Law of Peace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Those of you wishing to merge are, of course, still free to do so without AfD's help ... fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Great Law of Peace

POV, unsourced, if important should be merged with article on Iriquois. Hydriotaphia 02:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep this important aspect of Native American heritage. For reference, read this and this. Karol 18:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

P.S. I removed some of the POV statements and spruced the text up a bit. Karol 18:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• Merge While this treaty is important for the Iriquois there is simply not enough there to merit an encyclopedia article. While user Karol Langner cleaned it up, it would stand better to be merged as Hydriopathia suggests. Could we get an article about the Iriquois to merge it with? DeathThoreau 02:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

• Merge/Delete Unless there's more than a sentence about it, merge with the Iroquois article? (Where it isn't even mentioned) --Ajdz 08:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Stifle 23:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.