Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Lodge of Canada
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Grand Lodge of Canada
unnecessary redirect page (grand lodge of canada suffices) —This unsigned comment was added by Osgoodelawyer (talk • contribs) .
- Keep, its a necessary variation for redirect purposes, and we have plenty of server space for redirects.--CastAStone|(talk) 18:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as above. --Sneftel 19:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep until another Grand Lodge of Canada appears. (Note, any deletion should be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion, but I don't think it is necessary in this case.) Accurizer 21:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- My point is that there is an uncapitalized redirect, and if one types in the capitalized phrase, it goes to that page, and redirects from there, making the capitalized redirect page unnecessary. See "grand lodge of ontario" and how it will redirect anyone who enters "Grand Lodge of Ontario" in the same way. Osgoodelawyer 23:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, I see that that only works in the search box, and not if there is a direct link to Grand Lodge of Ontario. Still, it's unlikely that someone would create a link to the incorrect page, but if you don't mind having multiple redirect pages, I'm cool with that. Osgoodelawyer 23:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as redirect. Ardenn 01:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- It's not normal process to handle redirects on AFD; there's a separate redirects for deletion area to discuss these matters. I essentially think it's harmless and keepable, but for procedure's sake, would anybody object if I closed this discussion since it's not really an appropriate AFD matter? It can be relisted on RFD if anybody feels strongly about that. Bearcat 02:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
