Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graeme Diamanté

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Angr (talk • contribs) 12:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Graeme Diamanté

Delete At this stage of his career, I do not believe that Mr Diamanté is of sufficient importance to warrant an article on Wikipedia. The article fails to establish his current notability and could easily be interpreted as a vanity page. Whilst I wish Mr Diamanté well with his career I do not believe that currently he is of sufficient importance to be featured on wikipedia. If this article is to be interpreted as a biography, then I believe that the article currently fails to demonstrate that Mr Diamanté meets the criteria at WP:BIO The aticle has had few edits since creation (other than housekeeping/maintenance edits), the creator of the article seems to have made little other contribution to Wikipedia and the only article linking to the page is a redirection from a typo page. Politepunk 11:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• I am also nominating the redirect page mentioned above Graeme diamante, which would become vestigial in the event of the deletion of the main article. Politepunk 11:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable; very few Google hits. Feezo (Talk) 11:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Sandstein 13:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as per WP:BIO. --Terence Ong 13:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both No evidence of a high profile. Osomec 18:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both per Osomec --Khoikhoi 03:58, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity Nigelthefish 17:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.