Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golgothian Sylex (Magic: The Gathering)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 00:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Golgothian Sylex (Magic: The Gathering)

This article was originally deleted as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golgothian Sylex. The only legitimate user who voted "keep" on that AfD has recreated the article. Precedent (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahamoti djinn, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serra Angel, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juzam Djinn, etc.) has established that individual Magic cards are not notable. Andrew Levine 06:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Coulod you imagine if Wikipedia had details on EVERY SINGLE CARD in EVERY SINGLE CARD GAME? NightOwl91 11:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Power Nine precedent. If the nine rarest cards in the game (including the infamous Black Lotus) only deserve a combined article, no article on a single Magic card should be kept. I will concede that the backstory relating to the card has been added to the article, making it 'superior' to the other listed examples (which only copied the text and stats from the card itself), but do not believe this makes it any more 'deserving' of an article. Saberwyn - 08:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Whether it's about the card or the thing pictured on the card, it's not a subject that needs an encyclopedia article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:13, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Expansion hose - I used to play MTG when Antiquities was the newest expansion and even I don't remember this crappy card. --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 15:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.