Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Russell Borken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Glenn Russell Borken

non-notable author. 7 unique Google hits for "Glenn Russell Borken" (zero for "glenn borken"). His two "best known" works only produce one Google hit apiece - this page. Utterly fails WP:BIO, may be a hoax. See also father Richard Franklin Borkan's nomination above. -Elmer Clark 21:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable per above and per proposed Wikipedia:Notability (books). Akradecki 22:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --Nishkid64 23:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't seem to be a hoax, but doesn't pass WP:BIO either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 00:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Victoriagirl 07:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.