Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (G3). Physchim62 (talk) 11:30, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gigit

Curious rant about "gold digging" women and sexually transmitted diseases. -- RHaworth 17:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• delete Full of PoV. But what is more, totally unreferenced, and a google search on "Gigit"+"women" does not reveal any relenvat hits, and a google search on "Gigit" reveals no relevant hits in the first few pages. If this term is in fact in common use, some reference for thatr fact must be cited. then the PoV (prhares like "the good kind" ) can be dealt with. DES ^(talk) 17:55, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (or BJAODN, with an emphasis on the "B" and the "N") - obviously factually inaccurate, as there was no AIDS in the Old West - hard to read at all, but rather amusing. BD2412 T 18:11, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, nonsense. --Aurochs
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense and original work. Jtmichcock 03:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Aurochs & Jtmichcock -- JLaTondre 03:24, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Nonsense. Attack. POV. No sources. Original “research” (if it’s worthy of that word). ♠DanMS 05:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.