Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giannakis furs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Giannakis furs

Google gives the wikipedia entry of this hypothetical firm as first result, then no other hits. Maybe a vandal/joke. Cantalamessa 12:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• Regardless of what it is, that suggests a considerable gulf between the subject and notability. Delete. BigHaz 12:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There is no assertion of notability. --Porqin 12:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable if it exists. Deli nk 13:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as probable hoax (zero Google hits for a company dating back to the 15th century???), but would be notable if it existed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Benji64 14:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fur wasn't popular in Europe until at least the 17th C (aka, the time of the Hudson Bay Company). Hoax. Non-notable if true (very, very slim chance). -Royalguard11^Talk 18:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.