Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Back to Rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete unanimously. Looks like a hoax. Friday (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Get Back to Rock

Someone nominated it inappropriately for speedy, stating it is a hoax File Éireann 20:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• That's what the talk page discussion seems to imply. Delete for lack of verifiability. Friday (talk) 21:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, yes. Google comes up with nothing for me on this one. The official AC/DC site has nothing about it. I tagged it with a request for sources yesterday, but I'm not surprised that none have come up. FreplySpang (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete 31 Google hits for "Get Back to Rock" AC/Dc none of which verify this. [1]. Capitalistroadster 22:02, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above Tom Harrison ^(talk) 22:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --Roisterer 08:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The sooner we've gotten rid of this truthless article, the better. -- SoothingR^(pour) 20:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.
• Delete. Crystal-ballism. Cnwb 22:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Sarah Ewart 01:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.