Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Daniel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, so keeping as a default, but I think no precedent should be read from this --- Deville (Talk) 14:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] George Daniel

Non-notable person; article is nearly speedy-able for failing to assert notability, but not quite. At any rate, there's no indication that this person meets the WP:BIO criteria. Further, the author's sole edits are here, which makes this look like WP:VANITY. Valrith 21:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 21:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Executives of top-level professional sports teams are normally considered notable. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Very Weak Keep per TruthbringerToronto. This is a borderline case, but it does no harm to the encyclopedia to have the article. Powers ^T 01:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.