Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Agnew
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete. HappyCamper 06:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Geoff Agnew
Non-notable, possibly a hoax. Tonywalton | Talk 18:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy under A7, appearing on the Weakest Link is not an assertion of notability. - ulayiti (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- It was the "death by simultaneous bolts of lightning" bit that I was taking as an assertion of notability, to be honest. It's getting more notable not to have been on Weakest Link. No hits at all on the lightning, though - I do wonder if it's a hoax due to Geoff Agnew of Larne's contribution to a BBC web-based debate on stem cell research here, but the dates don't make sense as that debate closed in December last year. I'd be happy to see it speedied, though. Tonywalton | Talk 18:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. I must admit, still scratching my head here, I find a Larne rugby playing Geoff Agnew here. I look at the first post to this and think it's too unlikely to be a hoax. Alf 20:10, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a clear speedy, but definitely deletable. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:17, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Unverifiable. "Geoff Agnew" +lightning gets no hits on Google. Angela. 00:24, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Even if it were so, being struck by lightning does not make one notable. And hell, I've been on "Weakest Link". Denni☯ 01:02, 2005 August 26 (UTC)
- Pah. I've been on 15~1. And I'm still not notable. Tonywalton | Talk
- Delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.