Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay man's fifty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 02:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gay man's fifty

Wikipedia is not a slang guide. Also, no google hits on this particular slang Bill 16:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, this is non-notable as hell, and the oringinal thesis and "research" doesn't help; smite this article, Oh, Zeus!-MegamanZero 17:33, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, scores the amazing ZERO Google hits. Not only have I never heard of this term, it appears no one else has either. (Also, "Marijuana addicts"??? WTF???)Regina0613 18:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete by nominator and Regina0613. — JIP | Talk 19:33, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete anything with zero google hits. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 19:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Erm, what? -^demon 20:20, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• speedy delete nonsense. Stifle 00:18, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Hope Alive I disagree with all of you, the 'Gay Man's fifty' is a well used saying in the southern hemisphere. I myself, do not smoke marijuana, but to take this off wikipedia is a volation of free speech. If this definition gets taken off the website how are people going to express themselves when they purchase a 50 dollar amount of excessively taxed marijuana through a middle man? Answer me that. Daneil 10:18, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.