Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaslamp Fantasy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge to Girl Genius —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gaslamp Fantasy
Neologism for steam punk invented for a singular webcomic. It's not a genre term as the article claims, as the genre is populated by one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hahnchen (talk • contribs).
- Delete per nom. --Coredesat 02:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 03:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete More of a proposed neologism at this point. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 03:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Girl Genius; It certainly says a lot about the Foglio's attitude towards their not-really-a-webcomic (HINTS: Phil Foglio, Hugo Award) and other articles of its kind would kill for this sort of production information. Nifboy 06:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Girl Genius. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Girl Genius -- MrDolomite 14:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Note that the Girl Genius article actually describes it as steam punk, being that's what it is. - Hahnchen 14:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and add a very brief mention to Girl Genius that the author describes it as a "Gaslamp Fantasy" though the genre is generally called steampunk. TomTheHand 14:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 24.23.141.156 06:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Girl Genius --Oreb 20:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and merge any relevent bits to the main article. --Kunzite 23:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Girl Genius. It's a lovely phrase, but doesn't seem to have been used outside the context of GG. --Calair 00:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.