Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GGFan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as fifth repost of deleted material, and an nn-bio. Stifle (talk) 23:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GGFan

Delete non-notable fancruft page with no sources, so unverifiable. Has been created and speedied five times since September. On the talk page, the creator of the latest version claims it is more substantive (and has contested speedy and prod notices). Only claim to notability put forward so far is a link to a post on an external noticeboard claiming to be from GGFan. Gwernol 17:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Claiming to be from GGFan? Take a look at LionheartGGFans profile. Date joined: July 16th, 2005. Hey, The Alternative was created on July 16th, 2005! I gave you two valid sources, so you're wrong by saying there are no sources. So it is verifiable. I can provide more proof if you want BTW. It may have been created and speedied five times but this version isn't a life story or anything like that. It just gives all the good and bad details about a well known person in the Pokemon community, Gamefaqs and even in SDA (SpeedDemonsArchive).

[1] Game logs commented out Further proof supporting the link I sent —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MayaBoy (talk • contribs).

• Delete I commented out the game logs because they don't add anything to the debate. I don't think you understand the guidelines for biography and verifiability. A very few gamers become famous in real life and get covered in newspaper or magazine articles. GGFan isn't one of those. He is not notable outside the Pokemon gamer community, and his notability within the community can not be independently verified through reliable sources. If there is a Pokemon wiki he maybe should be listed there but not in Wikipedia. Thatcher131 17:53, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete repost ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 21:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.