Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Funk Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (but you might want to look at merging it, or do what I did with KLF Communications and have the main discography and a section on the vanity label in one article. The article as it stands is not of the best quality.) kingboyk 11:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] G-Funk Entertainment

171 hits on Google, a Yahoo! page, and nothing else (no domain, no nothing). NN :: Colin Keigher 18:11, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. And so what? it doesn't matter how many hits come up, but that it produced platinum albums. See Warren G. If you type "Bla Bla Records" in Googlefight it'll displays 1,410,000 (!) results. Try it! Then write an article on Bla Bla... Lajbi 19:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge to Warren G. The record label doesn't seem to have much significance beyond him though. --BillC 20:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

This is the essence of Vanity labels. Though it has released albums for the other artists of its roster. Lajbi 23:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Discography with Billboard chart positions completed. Is it still non-notable??? Lajbi 20:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.