Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck me USA (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fuck me USA (band)

Fuck me USA (band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable band. Don't see anything coming close to WP:MUSIC. Contested speedy. Leuko 06:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep as both members are part of a notable band. Quoting the sixth criterion of WP:MUSIC, though, a redirect may be the better solution and I certainly won't cry foul if that's done. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep it is notable.....barely. StayinAnon 06:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. One ep and one upcoming album is better than most, but does not meet WP:MUSIC, unless perhaps there are multiple press accounts to go along with it. bikeable (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I was actually the first admin to delete this (as a copyvio when it was Fuck me USA) so have tracked its progress quite well. Keep as it meets our Criteria for musicians and ensembles, Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; Band member Chris Olley is from Six by Seven, a band with seven albums under their belt. Simple as that I guess?  Glen  07:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Glen. --AlexWCovington (talk) 09:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Glen is right. The former band six By Seven have a large number of releases and this new band is firmly linked to that band. An account of FMUSA is definitely needed to chart the history of the past members of six by seven and to provide an account of this new band....) --Olliemorr 13:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep TSO1D 19:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep its not very good or long but they just started out. I thin it should stay though. jwlx 20:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless we come up with a way of transwiking to myspace. •Elomis• 22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a group just doesn't meet WP:MUSIC criteria. SkierRMH,07:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, meets WP:MUSIC. --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as per WP:MUSIC, but de-adverting copyediting is needed. -- The Anome 02:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - Kukini 02:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - meets WP:MUSIC - and I was the one who tagged the original with a copyvio. The current version reads better, but needs a minor cleanup. -- Whpq 18:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable". —ShadowHalo 23:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.