Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frawg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (7/1). Nom withdrawn anyways. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:04, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Frawg

This article is about a brand-spanking new drink. As such, it has no real notoriety. There's nothing more that can be written about this besides a stub anyway. Jacqui ^{★ 18:27, 4 November 2005 (UTC)}

Okay, I'm withdrawing this one -- you guys convinced me. Jacqui ^{★ 23:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)}

• Keep, peopel would want to be able to read about Pepsi products in an unlimited encyclopedia. Possibly merge somewhere appropriate. Kappa 18:32, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for now. Seems to be non-notable. I could see re-introducing this article later if the drink becomes notable. Holdek ^(talk) 18:37, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, regrettably. Any product from Pepsi is probably notable, and the fact that this is released in an exclusive deal with one retailer makes it moderately noteworthy. Sounds disgusting, though. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 18:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, if people see this in the store they might want to type it into Wikipedia and see what comes up. Expand article though. -Andrew 19:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, stubby but relays basic information about a Pepsi product. Products by a notable company deserve an article themselves. - Mgm|^(talk) 19:26, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. A bit of research proves its existence. And Pepsi products are notable. --Optichan 19:32, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, as Pepsi products are notable. Carioca 21:28, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but that sounds horrible. Meelar (talk) 02:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.