Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Drew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was 'no consensus. —Kirill Lokshin 00:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Frank Drew

NN bio. Though this man rose respectably high in the U.S. Armed Forces, I'm not sure that he's notable enough to merit an article. I humbly offer it up to the community's judgement. Draeco 04:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. The subject of the article has an admirable military record, but does not appear to satisfy WP:BIO. dbtfz^talk 04:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Royboycrashfan 05:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I would find keep but I cannot find any verifiable evidence on him. If I could be assured that this guy was an authentic USAF general, I would vote to keep and clean up. As I can't I will abstain for the moment. Capitalistroadster 05:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Finding info could be hard if he was a relatively minor general and has been retired since 1979 as the article purports. I've solicited info on the article creator's talk page at User talk:Mrmanhattanproject, hopefully he can shed some light. Draeco 05:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if verified, general officers and flag officers are usually notable. — Adrian Lamo ·· 19:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if verified, per Adrian. Highly positioned generals are notable, IMO. Staxringold 23:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I think this should be keeped, I have an alumni article regarding this guy.

mrmanhattanproject

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.