Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Tusken

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge with Tusken Raiders. For the record the vote count is 6d, 6k, 6m. Given the brevity of this article, I will call this a merge, although that does not mean that it cannot be split out to a longer separate article later. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:07, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fort Tusken

Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Star Wars "Expanded Universe" fancruft. — Gwalla | Talk 5 July 2005 02:37 (UTC)

• Extremely Weak Keep. Might actually be rather significant for the Expanded Universe category, but I'm not so sure it is. Whether "fancruft" is a criteria for deletion or not is also debatable. -- Natalinasmpf 5 July 2005 03:22 (UTC)
• Keep, seems notable to Star Wars fans. Kappa 5 July 2005 03:32 (UTC)
  • And only them, which makes it fancruft. --Calton | Talk 5 July 2005 06:47 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Dcarrano July 5, 2005 03:38 (UTC)
• Delete non notable fancruft. JamesBurns 5 July 2005 03:50 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable starwarscruft and if we're going to have every pokemon and geographical feature from LotR, we might as well let these stand. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish July 5, 2005 05:55 (UTC)
• Delete fancruft. --Calton | Talk 5 July 2005 06:47 (UTC)
• Merge into Tusken Raiders. Fancruft is not a valid reason for deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) July 5, 2005 08:10 (UTC)
• Merge This is non-notable fancruft, agreed, and there's no reason for an article, but it's a worthy footnote for another article I suppose. -Harmil 5 July 2005 12:44 (UTC)
• Weakest...keep...ever This is from Star Wars Galaxies, which (if memory serves) is in the lowest grade of SW canon. If merged, merge with Tatooine, not Tusken Raiders, since it's a geographic article. --Scimitar 5 July 2005 14:29 (UTC)
• Merge per Mgm. -- Jonel | Speak 5 July 2005 15:18 (UTC)
• Merge per Mgm. Early SWG location. Wikibofh 5 July 2005 16:57 (UTC)
• Merge, (with both Tatooine and Tusken Raiders as appropriate. Subject matter does not pass Bajoran wormhole test... or at least not by much. Article does not have enough source material to draw on to make a full paragraph of encyclopedic stature. Not known outside of fandom. Not an internet meme or similar cultural influence. No mainstream expressions referring to the subject (such as "Gritty as Fort Tusken" or the like). fancruft/mathcruft, etc. not valid criteria for deletion. Sherlock Holmes brother Mycroft is fancruft and we have Mycroft Holmes Pedant 2005 July 5 20:32 (UTC)
• Merge as per Mgm. 69.12.131.148 6 July 2005 04:04 (UTC) Sorry, this was me...Sabine's Sunbird 6 July 2005 04:04 (UTC)
• Keep provided a stub notice is added. Should also reference Star Wars Galaxies which is where Fort Tusken is most notable. -Husnock 6 July 2005 07:29 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm actually a big fan of fancruft, but this is ridiculous. Send the death star after this article. Gamaliel 7 July 2005 01:22 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable as canon or fancruft. SchmuckyTheCat 7 July 2005 03:05 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.