Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fontenot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --JoanneB 12:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fontenot

Non-notable, no sources. grafikm_fr 12:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Kukini 13:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Is the (barebones) citation of a surname even fit for Wiktionary? RGTraynor 14:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wstaffor 01:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a genealogical database. Fagstein 05:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as we can't have all names described here, but now I wonder why I haven't heard of a Wikealogy? Hey, wouldn't that be a great place to stick other name cruft, like Chinese pet names and Pet names (recently deceased)?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shenme (talk • contribs) .
• Delete- per nom, and Fagstein. DVD+ R/W 03:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.