Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Follow-me

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -Sean Curtin 23:59, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Follow-me

Delete. Someone copied this from an instruction manual for a telephony system. --nertzy 11:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

• This nom was never added to a main VfD page, and was malformed as well. Fixing all this now. No vote. JYolkowski // talk 13:54, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; looks like a joke --Hullbr3ach 17:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Copyvio - copy & paste job -PlainSight 17:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Then please tag it. Uncle G 18:21:26, 2005-09-05 (UTC)
• See also night service. Uncle G 18:21:26, 2005-09-05 (UTC)
• Delete. Not only is this a copyvio, it can't become an article either. I wouldn't waste time listing it as a copyvio if it can't be fixed. - Mgm|^(talk) 19:36, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Follow-me/Temp begs to differ on that point. Uncle G 21:08:21, 2005-09-05 (UTC)
    • Oops. In that case, Delete and replace with Temp page. Sorry for not using my eyes and look out for a temp. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:36, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
      • No worries. You would have seen a redlink at the time. ☺ I wasn't implying that you'd missed anything. I was making the counterargument that it is worthwhile listing it as a copyright problem, since it is possible to grow an article here once that has been done. Uncle G 22:14:17, 2005-09-06 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.