Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floyd-Warshall algorithm/C implementation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all articles. Mailer Diablo 13:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Floyd-Warshall algorithm/C implementation

I'm bundling two other implementations into this AfD since they should all be treated in the same way. Floyd-Warshall_algorithm/Python_implementation and Floyd-Warshall_algorithm/C_plus_plus_implementation Dlyons493 Talk 22:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• What is the point to this article. I doesn't really have an encyclopedic purpose. No Categories, stubs and not wikified. Maybe merge if it's valuable to a specific article, but delete if it's nothing important. Moe ε 22:11, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Floyd-Warshall algorithm which already contains pseudo-code. I don't see the need for separate language implementations. Dlyons493 Talk 22:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to WikiBooks as per similar articles. Thanks for the ref Pavel. Dlyons493 Talk 22:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quicksort implementations for another sibling. In the past source-code-only articles have been deleted, AFAIR. There's no chance to maintain source code examples in Wikipedia (who and how is one going to test them?). Links to external pages should be used instead. Pavel Vozenilek 22:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Pavel --Ruby 23:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Pavel. —Ruud 01:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Pavel. --Allan McInnes (talk) 02:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If somebody didn't put it up for deletion, I would've; three implementations are more confusing than just one. --bmills 04:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It seems, as the nom suggested, directionless. -- Greaser 06:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a source code repository —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-20 13:12Z
• Delete per, well, everyone. --Mgreenbe 13:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.