Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florian Segginger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. And let's all just pretend we didn't read that bit about "having the right" to remove autobiographies, for the sake of the phrase's writer. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:39, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Florian Segginger

Vanity page, as per User:TrashLock. Claims to be "most famous" for "Trash's Adventures" (which only gets just over one page of Google hits} and for being a game developer, which isn't really grounds for notability IMO. Delete CLW 00:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Game developers may be notable, but not when the "developer" is actually just a small time coder, and not when the "games" are simple macromedia flash animations with some free licence/stolen sound effects and computer generated voices --Qirex 04:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Or should I create a similar article about myself, and everyone in my class, and let everyone they know do the same? Bjelleklang - talk 04:36, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Developing flash animations is not notable enough, even if one is somewhat popular. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 04:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Note In case anyone didn't notice, he wrote the article himself, and is also the only one to contribute to it. Bjelleklang - talk 04:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Bleh go ahead, it's not like I care much about this article. It was more of a joke than anything. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TrashLock (talk • contribs).
• Keep He's no Neil Cicierega, but keep anyway. --Billpg 18:39, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, and I also think the user who posted it should be banned from wikipedia because [quote] It was more of a joke than anything. [/quote] Jporcaro 19:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, the article is decently written and mostly factual. (I removed POV statements like "egocentric").--Aleron235 20:25, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, after some thought, I don't think you people have the right to delete this article. If you read up a bit on the site, you will find that autobiographies are usually tolerated. It owuld be unfair to delete my article. Everything on this article is factual (now) and this article is not even linked anywhere. It's not self propaganda, it's just that some people might want a bit of info on myself and have the great idea of looking me up on wikipedia. --TrashLock 09:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. The guidelines for biographies are at WP:BIO. (My vote is unchanged, he has actually done something of note.)

• DELETE! (unsigned comment is first and only edit by 82.75.187.44 (talk • contribs)

• Relisted on 25 December in order to attempt to form a consensus. Please add comments below. —Cleared as filed. 07:44, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep per me. --Billpg 09:15, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Excuse me. You can't vote twice. Punkmorten 16:29, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
    • I know, hence "per me". This was in response to the "relisted" remark above. --Billpg 19:01, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Conforms to none of the qualifiers for people still alive at WP:BIO, or to the standard of these qualifiers. The site he is listed as the founder of has an Alexa rating of over 500,000. He fails the Google test with a stunning 12 unique hits (of 599) (including 2 from Wikipedia). "Trash's Adventures" beats him by 2 uniques. His Flash contributions to Newgrounds (under his original username) average about a 3/5 in community rating. I haven't checked the rest. Nothing in the biography appears to be externally verifiable, and could be classified as a vanity page. I don't think keeping this is in line with the Notability for Inclusion guidelines, in particular WP:BIO and WP:WEB. Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 10:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Saberwyn.  RasputinAXP  _{talk contribs} 11:38, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. non-notable. --Quarl 11:43, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn per Saberwyn. -feydey 14:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom and Saberwyn. -- Marcika 14:24, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. NN kid. 71.242.163.96 20:05, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Saberwyn. Punkmorten 21:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.