Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fgsfds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 09:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fgsfds

In spite of the title of the article, this is a perfectly good dictdef. It is, however, still a dictdef. Jkelly 02:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Groeck 02:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, don't transwiki limited to 4chan. ♥purplefeltangel ^(talk) ♥ ^{(Contributions)} 02:44, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, more 4chan junk.--nixie 03:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Jkelly. Shauri 05:41, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for being junk. --rob 06:42, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. Andrew pmk | Talk 17:28, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Perhaps this is a true thing (never seen it used myself), but it does not belong in an encylopedia. Amren ^(talk) 20:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; nn neologism. MCB 02:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Move to Internet Slang. Pacific Coast Highway 01:13, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Second move to Internet Slang. AV 01:21, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.