Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenella

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Fenella

Fenella (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

There are no links to the page, and have not been since August at least, and the article of the book from where this character originates is a stub. Character not deserving of an article, should be included on a "List of Characters" page at most. --MPD01605 (T / C) 00:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The article is too short to be helpful. In my opinion, the corresponding book's page is too short to warrant even a List of Characters page. PullToOpen 01:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I agree, even if the book's page is brought up to par, the book itself would have to become a lot more well-known before every minor character in it warrants a page here.--Dmz5 02:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 06:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nocontext, and even with context, still nn. SkierRMH,09:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The article gives no context to the character at all and sticks out like a sore thumb. Why create a seperate character page when the main article is a stub? No assertion of notability, absolutely no hint given that the character would need a seperate article at all. QuagmireDog 11:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 12:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and add the information to the main article.

PAGE HAS BEEN CHANGED TO DAB AFTER ALL ABOVE VOTES New voting on dab replaced at 15:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC) begins below.

• Keep Useful. TonyTheTiger 22:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. dab is much better and more useful. --MPD01605 (T / C) 02:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as now useful disambig. Good work. QuagmireDog 09:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Much better. PullToOpen 22:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)