Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feastoffools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Feastoffools

Borderline patent nonsense. Erik the Rude 01:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete I would gladly argue that this page is absolutely patent nonsense. And, for the record, the site's Alexa rank is in the 355,000 area. -- Kicking222 01:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. Kevin 01:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Complete bollocks. Danny Lilithborne 01:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. Ande B 01:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Nonsense. Not notable. --Starionwolf 02:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per all the above. Thetruthbelow^(talk) 04:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I don't know what this thing is. But there is a pretty active podcast called feast of fools. I'm finding tens of thousands of hits. There are parties which look like they are for the gay crowd called feast of fools. I think this is a real thing with a poor article which could get better in time. jbolden1517^Talk 04:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense. --Terence Ong 06:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete – as patent nonsense under CSD G1. If they're notable, someone's going to have to do a much better job if they want an article – Gurch 07:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable and incomprehensible as written. The podcast might (but it is unlikely) rate a line or possible two in a solid article about the historic Feast of Fools.Bejnar 09:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 09:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.