Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farting sexy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. – Sceptre ^(Talk) 09:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Farting sexy

Really dumb advertisement --Ruby 00:55, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 01:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - advert. While WP is not censored for minors, neither is it a repository for pornography (does that make me a prude? :) Camillus (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising for otherwise non-notable website. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unremarkable spam. -- Krash (Talk) 01:55, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per reasons above, plus...it smells. PJM 02:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, smelly. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 02:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy. No need for AfD. Monkeyman 02:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy per above. Daniel Case 03:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per CSD G1 NaconKantari e|t||c|m 03:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Waste of quality time even listing it here. --Jay(Reply) 04:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Deletions are interpreted very narrowly, this is not patent nonsense (CSD:G1) and I am not aware of any precedent for doing speedies on advertising (which can sometimes be a judgment call) --Ruby 04:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete As per Ruby, not sure what speedy cat this would fall under (cause it's an ad, not nonsense) so STRONG delete. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 04:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with prejudice, wish it could be speedied. Makemi 06:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: I don't know why they feel they need viral advertising. It seems like fart porn should sell itself... savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 06:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. non-notable website of "hot tooting babes". Cnwb 06:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete'. Piling on -- can we set the AfD record? Herostratus 08:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as close enough to CSD A1/G1 for government work. And Wikipedia. Tagged as such. Adrian Lamo ·· 08:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete A1. -- Samir ∙ ^T_C 09:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. That there is no speedy deletion criterion that covers this points out a flaw in the speedy deletion criteria, plain and simple. -ikkyu2 (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.