Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake spanish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was that there's some things in life money can't buy, for everything else there's BJAODN. - Mailer Diablo 22:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fake spanish

UE nonsense, delete. ComCat 02:11, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• Deleteo Descendall 02:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete No es enciclopédico. --Metropolitan90 02:32, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV essay describing unsubstantiated phenomenon. Contravenes WP:NOT, WP:NOR. encephalon 02:52, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. By the way, ComCat what does UE mean in English. It would make it much easier for us considering your nominations for you to explain what they mean and why you are nominating something. Capitalistroadster 02:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
  • At a guess, probably "UnEncyclopedic". — Haeleth Talk
• dont delete it is a good article with some good facts —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.246.131.89 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 2005 November 16 (UTC)
• Delete It's total nonsense. Cynicism addict 03:32, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• dont delete its the best article keep it now or ill be very very agrivated —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.30.149.215 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 2005 November 16 (UTC) (comment also edited by 70.246.131.89 (talk • contribs) at 03:34, 2005 November 16)
• Delete No place-o in Wiki-o-pedia, as above-o. I believe UE = Un-Encyclopedic. -=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 03:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment check out these "testimonials" on the Talk page. Priceless! -=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 03:46, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN, especially the talk page testimonials. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 05:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Borrado... I mean delete. Unreferenced, Unencyclopedic. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Obliterate I tried this when I was in Spanish, and my teacher only made fun of me. WAAAH!!!! DIE FAKE SPANISH!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
• This is so obviously a Delete that I almost lose my faith in the deletion process. It is embarrassingly idiotic. Logophile 13:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete patent {{nonsense}}. Very weak redirect to Spanglish (after deletion of course). — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 14:55, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Move to Fake espanish Demi ^T/_C 15:18, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• WP:-O — Haeleth Talk 17:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN and Delete funny --Jaranda(^{watz sup}) 18:00, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Kill and maim. Snout | rummage 18:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• El BJAODN-O mas rapidamente, por favor. Youngamerican 18:52, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Really Delete this fake article; as soon as possible. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 20:16, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and then Delete it until the sun comes up.Gateman1997 22:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN for sure. —Cleared as filed. 22:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but not quite BJAODN worthy. Turnstep 00:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as ridiculous. This isn't Spanglish, which is where a person who speaks English and Spanish transposes terms and words, it's kids in Spanish class making up words in class. Non-encylopedic. Jtmichcock 02:47, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Preaky 14:08, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. I'd vote delete as well, but it's already on BJAODN. Can we get rid of it now? --WAvegetarian 01:57, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedio deleto as patent nonsenso. It's already forever remembered in BJAODN. --Idont Havaname 05:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.