Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fagmastic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 18:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fagmastic

Neologism, not even worth transwiki to Wiktionary. Delete Owen× ☎ 20:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• According to the article, this is a protologism coined by two NCOs at Royal Marines Base Chivenor. Wikipedia is not for things made up by a couple of corporals one day. Delete. Uncle G 20:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as something completely made up in "school" one day.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 20:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• What is this? Delete it please. ... discospinster _talk 20:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone who has commented above. Thryduulf 22:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Baleeted! Danny Lilithborne 03:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• This word is worth transwiki, wiktionary and wikitranswiktionary, do not delete!*—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ragnarock456 (talk • contribs).
• Delete per above. :) Dlohcierekim 01:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable.Qball6 02:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.