Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facts News

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. The redirecter openly admits to being POV so far as I can tell, and the redirect is inappropriate anyway. The remaining participants are clear enough: the redirect is deleted. -Splash 01:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Facts_News

Apparently unnotable, zero Google hits, and the article itself fails to mention anything about who coined the term and where it would be used. Not to mention the "if something is said then the opposite has to be said because else it's POV" refrain. Rama 11:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

• delete unless proven more useful than what I feaer it is Rama 23:19, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• This item has been redirected to: Fox News DV8 2XL 13:02, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

• Can I ask why? Does anyone actually call it that? I mean, talk about POV... Should we forward Miserable failure to GWB? --Quasipalm 20:48, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

• Ohh, that forward to GWB would be fun. Heh. I don't care about being POV when I'm not doing official Wiki business.  :P Random comments FTW. Syrae Faileas - «Talk» 21:30, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Delete -- no forwarding. --Quasipalm 20:48, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete with no redirect to Fox News; that redirect currently exists, and is misleading and unverifiable. It editorializes about Fox News, and there is no evidence anyone calls it that. Googling for "Facts News" and "Facts News" "Fox News" did not turn anything up. --DavidConrad 11:47, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.