Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FSHOD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to delete the article --File Éireann 23:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FSHOD

Acronym for "Flying Shithook of Death". First-person narrative about something which at first glance appears to be patent nonsense but is likely simply something non-notable (author's personal circle of friends perhaps). If notability could be established it would need to be rewritten in an encyclopedic style. -- Curps 20:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn, unencyclopedic.--Adam ^(talk) 21:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete you know it's bad when the article has to say first off it is not really nonsense. Ruby 21:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • They put that there because the article has already been deleted once as nonsense. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete while it may be mildly interesting, it really has no place in WikiPedia. Otherwise, agree with Curps --Walter Görlitz 21:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Muchness 21:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, essay. The first acronym for FSHOD removed, now is only Fearlessly Seeking Honest Open Disclosure. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-27 21:59Z
• Strong Keep, always assume good faith. Al-Kadafi 22:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn group, good faith doesn't mean we have to keep all of the detritus put out there. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. total crap. Zzzzz 22:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, speedy if possible as nonsense article on vanity subject. I tried to restore comments deleted by Al-Kadafi here: [1], but it seems as if somebody else has already done that. SYCTHOS^talk 22:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.