Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exstreamer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, nowhere to merge to now. W.marsh 16:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Exstreamer

Exstreamer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

nn software, and I'm unsure A7 applies to software Will ^{(Tell me, is something eluding you, Sunshine?)} 16:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect and Merge - to Barix. There's alread a line on Exstreamer in the article, but it can be expanded a bit. →Bobby← 17:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• I am going to expand the article. This is just a beginning. --Clock twibright 17:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Please do not remove the nominator's comments when adding your own. Thanks! →Bobby← 17:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The article has enough meat for it to warrant its own entry. There are plenty of Google hits, though it would be nice to see a link or two to mainstream press reports. LittleOldMe 18:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Should I add some links? Where? On the discussion page or into the article itself? Are the links needed because of verifiability? --81.221.122.143 08:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge with Barix, whichever WP:CORP prefers. This appears to be a line of hardware, not software. Looks like it gets reviewed by computer and audiophile media, so it's notable. BCoates 12:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.