Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explorepda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Explorepda

Non-notable corporation as per WP:CORP Valrith 00:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and probable WP:VAIN (also a copy on User_talk:Explorepda) Yomangani^talk 01:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Michael 01:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Probably WP:VAIN? It definitely is! Allow me to present the strong evidence.

• Firstly, the user who created this article made his/her first edit about a week ago on this article.
• Secondly, the username of the particular user is Explorepda. This is a compelling evidence of vanity.

Furthermore, a google search shows less than five seperate hits for this company and completely fails the three main criterias of WP:CORP as well. Lastly, in their webpage[1], this company claims to be the leading provider of mobile downloads. This claim, however, is highly questionable. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 01:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, advertising. JIP | Talk 07:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising but not that good! Nigel ^(Talk) 10:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.