Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Greenspoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:56, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Evan Greenspoon

Non-notable, lack of meaningful content (possibly should be userfied) Dvyost 12:13, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

• Just delete - nn CLW 12:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no verifiability or significance. Friday (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as per WP:CSD A7. Hall Monitor 18:13, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy per CSD:A7--Isotope23 21:20, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per CSD A7.--Sean Jelly Baby? 22:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I've speedied this per the consensus of votes AND because Mr. Greenspoon's two partners in his endevor have already been speedied as CSD:A7.--Isotope23 00:02, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Evan Greenspoon, Round Two This article has been recreated, still non-notably; a request to have it speedied was declined, so I'm reposting it here. The film "Milk" gets no Google hits when combined with Greenspoon's name, nor does the Ogden-Nash film festival. Unverifiable, non-notable. I'd still suggest speedy but at the very least delete. --Dvyost 17:35, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

I originaly rejected this as a speedy - the article states that he's the co-editor of a magazine and stared in a film. Those claims may well be bogus, or notabilty may not be established by them, but can someone explain to me how that is not an assertion of notability per WP:CSD? --Doc (?) 18:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

I guess I'd argue that without any explanation of why this magazine or film is notable, there's still no explanation of notability; many of us have worked on small college publications or starred in a friend's film for a local film festival, and that's really not notability. Still, since I suspect you know the guidelines better than me, I've followed your advice and am perfectly happy to wait it out here. For clarity's sake I'll set this discussion off from the previous one.--Dvyost 19:00, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

• Actually, re-reading Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles makes me think that you're right, Doc. Change my vote to just delete, for the reasons I listed above. --Dvyost 19:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete not notable enough for Wikipedia. Johntex\^talk 19:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. --Daniel Lotspeich 08:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.