Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Empire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] European_Empire
Original research, POV, most of the article is irrelevant to the topic that it is supposed to be about Gsd2000 21:59, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete, Original research San Saba 22:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't add anything new. Sijo Ripa 00:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Don't delete. It adds an important element of a new debate on European enlargement and power Ouip 03:11, 24th April 2006 (GMT)
- Delete - appropriate location for the debate "on European enlargement and power" is EU Expansion, has the appearance of a POV fork --Ajdz 05:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Or maybe weak keep and delete in a month or two. The article is not necessarily a POV fork, but rather a similar entry to American Empire (term). However, the article as it stands provides no clue as to the validity and notability of the term. The quotes by Robert Cooper, while interesting, do not seem to concern the topic at hand. The Minister of War (Peace) 07:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete. The article per se should exist, but well-referenced and non-OR/non-POV. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 10:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as POV fork. Not an established term, as far as I can tell. Robin Johnson 15:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as POV fork. Bhoeble 09:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. - Rudykog 19:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
