Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclovandalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Encyclovandalism

I hope this isn't an example of the phenomenon it describes LOL. Ayway it doesn't google, and a being mentioned once on television doesn't demonstrate that it's an established concept, not a nonce word. Kappa 18:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. I may have spelled the word differently although it was discussed at length. I'm trying to get in contact with the author to find his article. 19:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete one time use words have no business on Wikipedia or WikiDictionary.Gateman1997 19:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Proto t c 13:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (speedy?) - article makes the case very clear. According to the article itself, it is a neologism about Wikipedia vandalism that was first mentioned on CNN yesterday. It even states who recently coined the term. B.Wind 17:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stifle 00:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.