Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy ann wooding

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Won't normally close AfDs I participate in, but in this case there are many comments all but one of which agree, so I don't think I have any conflicts of interest. -Splash 22:16, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Emmy ann wooding

Sad, perhaps, but wikipedia is not a memorial. Not notable. Brighterorange 19:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete WP is not a memorial. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:37, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I would have speedied it. Zoe 19:47, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a memorial. DV8 2XL 19:49, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete—Thats really sad, but its not notable enough to be included here.

  Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}

• Merge to Law and Order. Tonywalton  | Talk 22:34, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • What?! I'm sorry, that's just ludicrous. Zoe 05:25, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Roodog2k (talk) 23:20, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete WP:ISNOT a memorial as above. Borderline A7 speedy, but possibly not. -Splash 00:58, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Journalist Rhyddfrydol 21:12 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It doesn't really give enough info to the reader to warrant as an article.Spawn Man 12:01, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.