Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Kalmbach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 17:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Emil Kalmbach

Fails WP:BIO. Being married to a small-town mayor does not impart notability. Fluit 03:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep Super weak keep that shouldn't really even be considered As it's the first time I've ever seen the term "First Gentleman" used.--SeizureDog 03:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The term "first gentleman" is used, though it is not common. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 03:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah, the whole article just seems novel to me :) Changed my vote to what I was really thinking.--SeizureDog 03:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It's his wife that's notable not him, also everything that needs to be said is in his wife's article (which needs cleaning up). Yanksox 03:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --Metropolitan90 04:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Mets501^talk 07:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete being connected with someone notable doesn't make that person notable themselves Ydam 11:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and Delete Rita Kalmbach too. ~ trialsanderrors 17:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.