Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eman Bonnici

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:37, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Eman Bonnici

Delete this article:

• Who cares what autographs he has?
• A 16-year old secretary to a Bishop. Should we list all the secretaries to bishops?
• The information contained therein is not of public importance but concerns the private life of an individual.

Maltesedog 14:16, 08 September 2005 (UTC)

• If the article is accurate, keep it. A person who is a published author, radio announcer, journalist, and episcipopal secretary at age 17 is notable IMO. But is it accurate? there are no sources cited, and this is quite a list. Could this be a hoax? Can anyone verify the accuracy of this articel and cite sources, or else verify that it is a hoax? If kept, the level detail on the collections should be reduced significantly, IMO. DES ^(talk) 14:37, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

• Found sufficient proof of journalism on RTK radio, but none for the secretary of the bishop thing. It is also important to note that the bishop in question is only a titular bishop and in actual fact does not have a specific region under his hands. Also it is very strange for a person of 16 years to know the languages mentioned especially in an island like Malta.. especially Greek! It could be true, but it is far fetched.Maltesedog ^(talk) 14:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete smacks of a hoax, but I doubt if sufficiently notable even if everything claimed is true. PatGallacher 16:00, 2005 September 8 (UTC)
• Delete Seems strongly like a hoax; google search turns up nothing of note. Dottore So 17:29, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity that reeks of a hoax. I don't buy writing numerous books by the age of 17 - and having none of them, or your name, appear on Amazon. Note that Google picks up a few of his postings to forums and things; most of them are in teenlang, unsurprisingly. -Splash 17:57, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, claims are unverified, probably unverifiable. -- BD2412 ^talk 18:24, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The burden of proof of notablity falls squarely on the article author. Delete as hoax unless references can be produced. Fernando Rizo T/C 20:55, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable. Andrew pmk | Talk 00:03, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nonnotable teenaged autograph collector. Probably vanity. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 06:58, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment An IP user just reverted many recent changes to this article, removign teh AfD tag (which was probably the point) I have restorted to the last valid version. DES ^(talk) 17:41, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.