This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 05:25, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Seems to be an soft advert for some persons blog. --Boothy443 | comhrĂ 21:15, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, self-promotion. --nixie 23:09, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 05:32, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.